Border reivers were actually historically the warring clans along the Scottish/English border many centuries ago. But then again the past repeats itself. Because no one ever learns from the mistakes of others and oftentimes not even from their own. And yes, those are all old maxims, but nevertheless oh so accurate. And they are the premises that drives on this tale of the near future Scottish rebellion, the near future where Brexit and subsequent collapse of EU has led to a succession of a collectivist socialist party in England led by a well intentioned charismatic lunatic with a diabolically evil second in command. Anyone with even a superficial knowledge of recent past is well aware that neither of those things, socialism of collectivism, work and there are terrifying displays throughout the last century especially of just how tragically and lethally they fail and yet…you know those who don’t learn are doomed to repeat and there they go. The farms are to be taken away from the people who own and work them idea doesn’t sit well with a stoic powerhouse of a farmer named Nathaniel Bell, so he decides to take a stand and, when his family pays a terrible toll for it, he goes on the offensive, a one man war against the new world order that becomes something like a call to arms or even…gasp…a revolution. Is that sounds familiar at all, it’s because it’s basically a plot of Braveheart updated for the modern age. You can just imagine Mel Gibson busting out his best Scottish brogue for this. No blue stripes this time or long locks, but still…it’s all there. Right down to the ending. The only thing is Braveheart for all its shortcomings was actually very entertaining. This book is considerably less so. I wasn’t a huge fan of the author’s writing, it seemed very…mechanical somehow, all descriptions, no inner life, all show no tell in a way, and entirely too much action. I mean, obviously, some was necessary to the story, but the entire thing didn’t really work for me, too militant, too testosterony. Objectively it was decent enough, the writing was perfectly serviceable, the plot had some intriguing ideas, the characters tried for dimensionality, albeit mostly were divided along the good and evil sides pretty strictly, except for the charismatic ne leader who did show some ambivalence. But in the end it just really didn’t work for me, the writing didn’t draw me in, all that action didn’t really excite and the parallels to Braveheart were just too blatant. The thing is the past does recycle itself and with all that’s going on in the world, nothing is no longer off the table politics wise, so the book may have been terrifyingly prescient had it gone for a more dramatic less action driven approach, but as is…William Wallace wants his life story back. Or a credit. Yeah, didn’t like this much, tried, but just wasn’t for me. Kind of had to speed read it just to get it over with. Then again, it has a bunch of good reviews, so it obviously stirred some minds and imaginations. Thanks Netgalley.