Cover Image: The Paper Chase

The Paper Chase

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

The intricacies of eighteenth-century printing might not, on the surface of it, sound like the most thrilling of topics but, as Dr Joseph Hone proves in The Paper Chase, publications that came out of the printer’s workshops had the potential to send men to the gallows, bring down governments, alter national policy, impact on the course of a war, and to threaten the security of the nation’s most revered institutions.

The Paper Chase follows the hunt for one particular anonymous pamphlet: a polemic entitled The Memorial of the Church of England. Printed by David Edwards – a Welsh printer with Jacobite sympathies and an established ‘radical’ press in Nevill’s Alley – the pamphlet was a High Church attack on the Godolphin administration and its policy of ‘moderation’. It implied that, by tolerating and working with Protestant dissenters, Queen Anne’s government – and, by implication, Anne herself – were not acting in the best interests of the Church of England.

The pamphlet, unsurprisingly, caused an outcry: Queen Anne was deeply upset by it, Parliament was outraged and, from the spires of Oxford to the streets of London, people were talking about the Memorial and trying to work out who its anonymous author(s) might be. Chief amongst these people was Robert Harley. A natural politician and prominent proponent of moderation, Harley started following the paper trail that led out of Nevill’s Alley, coaxing out the book’s secret’s and untangling the web of connections that would see his fate entwined with that of David Edwards in unexpected ways.

Given that my PhD is in eighteenth-century literature, many of the political intrigues and prominent figures in The Paper Chase were familiar to me. The politics of the period – especially in the earlier part of the century – are endlessly fascinating but, without a crash course in its terminology and structures (Whig, Tory, Churchmen, Toleration, Moderation etc), it can be overwhelmingly confusing for the general reader. It is to Hone’s credit, therefore, that he conveys a complex political environment – one that encompasses religious, political, and literary figures and factions – in a succinct yet through manner, guiding the reader into the knotty world of Harley, the Memorial, and the tangled connections that existed between press and Parliament.

Written with an academic’s eye for detail and told with vigour, The Paper Chase offers a blend of scholarship and detection that is sure to appeal to fans of narrative non-fiction in the vein of Kate Summerscale. That said, The Paper Chase is, in essence, a book about printing and pamphleteering: readers heading into it expecting a detective-style chase across London will be left sorely disappointed. Harley’s investigation into the Memorial was painstaking and thorough and the book follows the fates and fortunes of its central protagonists over several years. Whilst it has its thrilling moments – including night time raids on coffee houses and the hunt for a mysterious masked woman – the pleasure of The Paper Chase is in Hone’s gradual untangling of connections and his patient explanations of the wider implications of seemingly minor events.

Offering an insight into a period of history that remains under-represented in the arena of ‘popular’ print, The Paper Chase is an insightful and immersive tale of eighteenth-century politics and printing that is perfectly pitched for both general and academic readers alike. Combining scholarly precision with an engaging and accessible style, it’s a highly recommended read for fans of unusual mysteries, narrative non-fiction, and all things bookish.

Was this review helpful?

THank you for the opportunity to read this.

Unfortunately I was not able to finish this book, it was not exactly what I had expected and I found it too heavy going to get to the end.

I've not put up any negative reviews, and therefore will have to class this as a DNR on Netgalley.

Thanks again for the opportunity!

Was this review helpful?

In the early years of the 18th century London was full of sedition. Pamphleteers walked a fine line between expressing opinion and outright treason and the ones to suffer were the publishers. In a business where most were only just above the poverty line, publishing a successful booklet could make one’s fortune. When Edwards publishes the ‘Histiry of the Church’ he falls foul of the law and the Queen’s agent Harley is determined to punish all involved but who are they and where have they gone.

This book is a fascinating insight into the early days of political journalism and publishing. The appetite for news and opinion was great and the authorities were ruthless in their attempts to stem the tide. This book takes a single case and explores the system as a whole. It is meticulously researched and very interesting.

Was this review helpful?

This was an interesting look to a specific moment in British history. The writing was good and generally accessible to read. There were a few chapters i did think that were a bit dry and they needed to edit it aa bit as it didn't read as good as it could have. I did like this but it was a little bit underwhelming for me.

Was this review helpful?