Cover Image: Ingredients

Ingredients

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Due to a sudden, unexpected passing in the family a few years ago and another more recently and my subsequent (mental) health issues stemming from that, I was unable to download this book in time to review it before it was archived as I did not visit this site for several years after the bereavements. This meant I didn't read or venture onto netgalley for years as not only did it remind me of that person as they shared my passion for reading, but I also struggled to maintain interest in anything due to overwhelming depression. I was therefore unable to download this title in time and so I couldn't give a review as it wasn't successfully acquired before it was archived. The second issue that has happened with some of my other books is that I had them downloaded to one particular device and said device is now defunct, so I have no access to those books anymore, sadly.

This means I can't leave an accurate reflection of my feelings towards the book as I am unable to read it now and so I am leaving a message of explanation instead. I am now back to reading and reviewing full time as once considerable time had passed I have found that books have been helping me significantly in terms of my mindset and mental health - this was after having no interest in anything for quite a number of years after the passings. Anything requested and approved will be read and a review written and posted to Amazon (where I am a Hall of Famer & Top Reviewer), Goodreads (where I have several thousand friends and the same amount who follow my reviews) and Waterstones (or Barnes & Noble if the publisher is American based). Thank you for the opportunity and apologies for the inconvenience.

Was this review helpful?

The NetGalley app kept crashing so I was unable to read this before it became unavailable. I really was looking forward to it.

Was this review helpful?

'Ingredients' is a fascinating book written in such a fun, accessible way. The book is not trying to explain what the ingredients are, and how they really interact with our bodies, but speaks more about how we know that something is safe. It talks about the vast amounts of data associated with the food and chemical industry, and how we should interpret this data. It is a great read for anyone who gets easily scared by headlines telling us that coffee is good/bad for you, or any other hyped theories. The author makes the whole journey funny and engaging.

Was this review helpful?

This book is absolutely fascinating, and written in such an enjoyable way. Think mad professor, eccentric genius, and that's the author, and I mean that as a massive compliment. He brings such life and fun to a rather serious subject.
We cover a huge variety of ingredients in the three parts of this mine of information. The first part focusses on processed food, plants and microbes. Part Two is intriguingly named 'how bad is bad' and weighs up certainty versus uncertainty, and Part Three, Should you eat that Cheese Puff or not, takes a level-headed but joyous look at the alleged evils of many familiar items, edible and otherwise. It finishes with the chapter 'So what do I do'?'
I'll tell you what to do - read this book and you'll come away much better informed and more able to assess for yourself all the food warnings and/or enthusiastic promotions that bombard us practically all the time.
And you'll know what some of the 950+ chemicals in roasted coffee are.
Writing this review - rather longer after reading the book than intended - has reminded me of exactly how informative and entertaining it was. I'm going to have to read it again now.
I hope we'll see more from this author.

Was this review helpful?

Zaidan explores beyond the common wisdom of what's healthy to put in and on your body, such as homemade cheese puffs and whether sunblock is bad for your skin (yes to everyday use, but good for you in long-term sun exposure). He spews humor like a middle-grade boy farting in his armpit, often funny, sometimes silly, sometimes gross. He also explains why studies contradicts studies and the rollercoastering of foods being bad for you one day, good the next, and reverse again. It's definitely worth the read to shine the light on an unexpected perspective. Personally, my takeaway is to not worry about these things as much as I do, because honestly, much of it's marketing apparently. I received a digital copy through NetGalley. (Is this the same book as "Ingredients: The Strange Chemistry of What We Put in Us and on Us" published by Dutton Books? Is this one self-published?)

Was this review helpful?

One thing’s for sure: George Zaidan is beautifully nuts. How else can you turn what is an intrinsically fascinating but ever-so-slightly dry subject into a book of witty ROTFL chapters?
Whether you contemplate embalming a cow or follow Mabel the aphid when she expertly plunges her syringe mouth into a leaf, the life of ingredients is nevernever dull.
I haven’t had that many belly laughs (especially for a science book) in a looooong time. It lifts the lid on the confusing world of sunscreens and tells you that when you REALLY use the manufacturer’s recommended amount: “I felt like I had walked through a Lurpak carwash.”
The chapter on lifestyle choices and their resulting actual change in life expectancy was one of the most enlightening I’ve read to date.
I’ve already bought a copy for my sunscreen-eschewing, vaping friend for a lot of Eureka moments and, no doubt, there will be more to follow for the processed-food-loving smokers of my acquaintance.
The beauty of the book is that it is never condescending or preachy, but, BOY, does it ram the message home.
A shining whopping Grade A belter of a book!

Was this review helpful?

OMG. If you have ever read a headline like “ Coffee causes Cancer” and thought you had to stop drinking coffee, You MUST read this book.
It is a lot of science and takes a little time and effort to get into, but the author is hilarious as he explains the science of stats and studies and process of foods we consume.
I will never hear a statistical headline again without putting on the asshole hat. Best book I have ever seen on the statistic front. A must read even if you are not a scientist.

Was this review helpful?

I love reading about food and food industry and this book thought me so many various things! To be honest, I don't care much about humour when it comes to nonfiction books and I didn't particularly enjoy the humour in this book as well. But I can see how people would enjoy it. Also, it was so easy to understand with all the data and simple explanations. Now I know how I should think about the nutritional studies. A good book!

Was this review helpful?

Thanks to NetGalley for this title.

Wow! What a really well written, clear and well-researched piece of pop-science writing. I was immediately entertained by the writing style, and within the first two or three pages, I was recommending this book to everyone I know.

If you've ever wondered to what extent you can believe news headlines that say things like "Eating too many onions gives you cancer" or suchlike, this is absolutely the book for you. In fact, even if you haven't wondered that, it's still probably the book for you. Instead of overwhelming you with scientific jargon to the point your eyes gloss over and you fall asleep, this book gives you all the science and evaluates the evidence carefully without your needing a degree from Harvard to understand it.

Overall an excellent introduction to organic chemistry and food science.

Was this review helpful?

Not only throughly informative, but also surprisingly hilarious guide to things we really ought to know. But also a reminder of just how much we don't know and how much science changes its mind on these matter. Smart, informative, well written. Recommended. Thanks Netgalley.

Was this review helpful?

Ingredients reminded me a little of What if? https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21413662-what-if-serious-scientific-answers-to-absurd-hypothetical-questions/
In a very funny way he brings us into the world with data, and teaches us how to understand science, and scientific studies. I was already a little suspicious of health fads and studies, but will now be reading them extra carefully.
I truly enjoyed reading this book, learning about plants, sunscreen and cheese puffs. Would recommend this book.

Was this review helpful?

If you're like me and live math and science, this book's for you! In Ingredients, Gregory Zaidan explains the process and mathematics behind studies of probable outcomes, including the issues of mathematical errors and poorly chosen study subjects.

Ingredients also answers such pressing questions as, "Is too much sunscreen bad for you?" Answer is "probably" since it's killing coral reefs. Another question asks how many cheese puffs must you eat to affect your life expectancy?

If you like your facts with a side of snark, Ingredients is a great read for you!

In the interest of full disclosure, I received a free digital copy of this title to review from Net Galley.

#Ingredients#NetGalley

Was this review helpful?

I found this book to be fascinating although it wasn't at all what I expected.

This book is about how various things are reviewed, how scientists decided something is good for you or harmful, the flaws in the process (he calls them "potholes"), and why we probably shouldn't read all the click bait we find on the internet about a superfood that will heal all that ails us.

There were parts that I must admit I almost slept through. Some of the chemistry (carbon binds with oxygen, etc) were certainly snooze worthy if this had been an audio book. Sadly, it was on my kindle so I had to read it all.

In the end, the book tells you to not become consumed with most studies. Exercise, loose a few pounds, drink in moderation, wash your hands, use hand sanitizer, and put on sunscreen according to directions. And most importantly, if you smoke or vape, STOP! These are all things that we hear over and over again.

The reason I gave the book 3 stars, as interesting as it was, is because I was scandalized by the author using the "f" word repeatedly. I could think of no reason for doing this. Many of his other comments I am certain he found hilarious, but I am not amused by references which formerly would be considered gutter language and still is by many readers. I guess the author and publisher thought this would make it more on the level of a lay reader, but instead it insults the sensibilities and lowers the overall credibility of the science.It wasn't at all humorous. It only detracted from the rest of the narrative.

There were some pages I wished I could share with others, but alas, that is impossible to do with a kindle. If I'd had a paperback, I would have simply scanned the pages and sent them to friends who might be interested. I will instead urge them to get the book from the library and skim it.

Was this review helpful?

In Ingredients, Zaidan explores questions and misconceptions about the things we eat, use and put on our bodies. First of all, George Zaidan is an incredibly engaging and fun writer. He's funny and clearly knows what he's talking about and clearly is a very competent scientist and researcher. However, like many scientists, he finds a LOT of things interesting, resulting in some tangents that eventually, slowly wind their way back to the original subject of the chapter. This is not unwelcome but sometimes can feel almost exhausting almost as if you are fighting to catch up with what the author's racing thoughts. Saying that, he often presents information in the best ways, tables, images that make sense and are easy to digest. His main purpose though, is to make us better informed and better equipped to make our own conclusions on misleading, outlandish scientific headlines.

Was this review helpful?

It’s fair to say George Zaidan’s Ingredients is written in an idiosyncratic way (and that’s NOT a criticism). The dedication reads “To Mom, Dad, and Julia: Sorry”. Any book that makes me snigger before Page 1 and then starts the preface with “Going to university was like going to Hogwarts.” has me gripped!

Zaidan takes us through the chemistry of food and the statistics of nutritional studies in a very approachable manner. He obviously really really knows his stuff but explains it with simple equations such as “SOME CHEMICAL + SOME OTHER CHEMICAL ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE”. Consider a question such as “Is processed food bad for you?”. Zaidan forces us to consider each aspect of the question: what do we mean by “processed”? How do we measure “bad for you”? A woffly question will get a woffly answer – precision is important if we want accurate answers.

We’re accustomed to seeing headlines such as “Scientists say coffee linked to heart disease”, followed sometime later by “Scientists say coffee NOT linked to heart disease”. Surely, it’s one or the other – can’t scientists make their minds up? Zaidan explains that we expect science to be deterministic, e.g. if you add vinegar to baking soda, you will always get a bubbly froth. However, many chemical reactions are probabilistic: if a human smokes cigarettes, there is a (very high) probability it will kill them – but it’s not a 100% certainty. Zaidan takes us through the steps of deciding whether smoking causes cancer, challenging conclusions every step of the way and forcing us to consider whether there may be alternative explanations. He explains the vast chasm of difference between correlated and causal, showing how we should challenge sensational headlines with questions such as “How many people were involved in the study?”; “Did the scientists preregister the study in NIH’s database, stating what they were going to do; what they predicted the outcome would be; and what it actually was?”

I loved the facts strewn through the book, e.g. an oak tree can make 25kg of glucose every single day and lactobacillus reproduces at speeds that make rabbits look like nuns. I think the combination of chatty “trust me because I speak street-language” with an excellent explanation of the science is a winner. However, I’m less convinced that the street-language has to contain expletives (and that's the only reason I'm giving four stars, not five). I don’t think they’re necessary in a book that should be compulsory reading for anyone allowed to vote. This book doesn’t just explain the science of food and how our bodies react, it also teaches us to ask probing questions about any statement of so-called “facts”.

#Ingredients #NetGalley

Was this review helpful?

This is a fascinating book examining not just some ingredients of our modern lives, but the process by which scientists figure out what's good for us and what is not. Consider: for the first few decades of serious research on the health effects of coffee, a significant number of coffee drinkers always paired that cup of Joe with a cigarette.
Factors like these can make it hard to come up with firm decisions about what we should do for our health.
The book is full of graphic details (I will never think of aphids the same way again) and surprising insights into chemistry's contributions to our health. There are also some recommendations for how we can make responsible decisions about the ingredients we consumer.
You don't need a strong science or math background to understand this book, and it's really quite funny.

Was this review helpful?

Thanks to netgalley and Duckworth books for access to this arc.


Just the cover alone was enough to grab my attention but then the blurb promised me info on coffee, cheesepuffs and sunscreen. Here’s a book on science by an MIT trained chemist who’s trying to cut through the bullshit and reveal what goes into experiments, what can be wrong about experiments (turns out – a whole shitload), why not to click on the latest “Studies Reveal …!!!” headline on the internets, and how to look at association vs causal vs should you really worry.

There’s a lot of science out there but there’s a lot of bad science out there, too. Since our brains are naturally poised to take the swan dive leap from “association” to “it’s true!,” it behooves us to keep in mind that not every earth shattering “science” headline we read actually is true. The things we eat, drink, smoke, and slather on our bodies are complicated chemicals and since our bodies have lots of complicated chemicals in them, weird reactions can and do take place that are hard to study or understand. And sometimes processed foods are actually good for us. Well, what do you think honey is?

I also learned a lot of things. Plants – sometimes they are out to kill you. The importance of photosynthesis – we’d all be dead without it so even if some plants are out to kill you, they’re still the good guys. Transforming toxic plants into edible food is processing them. Microbes will steal our food if they can get to it first but sometimes we can use the little bastards to our own ends. Aphid shitballs taste good. Scientists can hold grudges against each other. They can also engage in p-hacking because it’s publish or perish. It’s too bad that the word “theory” has different meanings to scientists and nonscientists.

So will that Cheeto kill you? Probably not. But bags and bags of them over years and years probably won’t do much for your health. Is sunscreen safe? It’s better than getting cancer from sun tanning as proved in a (sorta scientific controlled) experiment that Great Britain (unintentionally) set up centuries ago called “Australia.” Is coffee good or bad for you? Yes. And you don’t want to know what causes the “Pool Smell” (it ain’t just bleach).

If chapter headings such as “Associations, or the Grapes of Math” with subheading “This chapter is about Ents, private jets, potholes, olive oil, Scorpios, and Santa” appeal to you, check out this hilarious trip through Science. Because … it’s Science! B

Was this review helpful?

Ingredients addresses the content of many things we consume every day. You can learn about processed foods, what they are, are they really that bad; why smoking is bad for you; and what we know about sunscreens.
While I find that the book is well written and it's easy to see how much research has been conducted for it, I feel that it misses the point somehow. I feel like a lot a chapters go off on tangents that don't necessarily answer the question of the chapter's title. However, the information that was included was well presented and formulated in an easy to digest way.
This was an interesting read, however I feel that wasn't the correct target audience as I didn't learn as many new things as I had hoped.

*Thanks to NetGalley and Duckworth Books for providing me with an ARC of this title in exchange for an honest review.*

Was this review helpful?