Cover Image: The Secret of Life

The Secret of Life

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

As a scientist, I was intrigued by the premise of this book, especially as the “real” story of Watson & Crick’s discovery has become far more well-known in the past decade. However, I’m afraid I underestimated the worthiness of the book - found it hard-going, which is almost certainly my failing and not one relating to the author’s writing style or competence..

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and W. W. Norton & Company for an e-copy of Howard Markel's The Secret of Life. This book was clearly well researched and extremely thorough in recounting the intriguing tale of how scientists cracked the code of DNA. Markel blends an informative account of the science behind DNA's structural discovery with the compelling and complex interplay between the scientists involved in the race to make the great discovery. I would highly recommend for lovers of medical history and narrative nonfiction!

Was this review helpful?

This is the book I've been waiting for as a scientist. The discovery of the structure of DNA is something that's been repeated to me throughout each increment of my education. Occasionally Rosalind Franklin would be mentioned, albeit infrequently & briefly, and as I became older it began to be more of a bug-bear, the fact that the credit for the discovery went to two men, who in reality stole data & the credit from Rosalind herself.
Despite this, the book hinges more on the personalities of those involved & the intricacies and interactions between them.
I'd say this is a must read for anyone who wants to learn more about what happened between these scientists. Having said this, I do think some biology knowledge or a fond liking for wikipedia is necessary to get the most from this, as in some places the language can get quite technical, particularly where the x-ray crystallography is concerned.

Was this review helpful?

"The Secret of Life is a story of genius and perseverance, but also a saga of cronyism, misogyny, anti-Semitism, and misconduct. Drawing on voluminous archival research, including interviews with James Watson and with Franklin’s sister, Jenifer Glynn, Markel provides a fascinating look at how science is done, how reputations are undone, and how history is written, and revised."

This quote from the publisher's description sums up the book nicely. It's more about personalities than about science, though science plays a huge role. As a woman, it was painful but unsurprising to read about how Franklin was abused and slandered by her male colleagues.

Above all, this book elevates Franklin to the place she deserves. Her X-ray work likely cost her her life, but revealed the structure of DNA that led to Watson and Crick's Nobel Prize winning breakthrough. Her name belongs beside theirs for the rest of time.

Thanks, NetGalley, for the ARC I received. This is my honest and voluntary review.

Was this review helpful?

In almost every science textbook you'll find the story of James Watson and Francis Crick discovering the double helix in 1953.  The truth is, there were multiple people looking into the  building blocks of life, including Rosalind Franklin who was the first to photograph it.  The Secret of Life looks at five main people who helped lead to the discovery of DNA: Watson, Crick, Rosalind Franklin, Maurice Wilkins, and Linus Pauling.  This book looks at the antisemitism,  misogynic, and old boys club mentality that gave the spoils to Watson and Crick over the others who did a large portion of the world.

Howard Markel tells the incredible story of the discovery, as well as illustrates the background and history that lead to major discoveries in science. His writing is smart, fun to read, and feels like one is looking into science's dirty little secret.

The Secret of Life is available September 21st from W.W. Norton and company.

Was this review helpful?

A challenging and hard read, but full of information. I am not well informed when it comes to DNA, but this book did help my understanding.

Was this review helpful?

In spring of 1968 I was sitting in my high school biology class listening to Mr. Gasiorowski explain the miracle of life. He was excited, transported, his face illuminated. He reverentially talked about James Watson and the discovery of the double helix. Sometime afterward, I found Watson’s book The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA on the shelf of the drug store I passed on my walk home from school and spent my meagre allowance to buy it.

My teacher knew that the discovery marked a watershed moment. But Watson’s book was part mythos and novelized for effect.

James Watson and Francis Crick were young and brilliant, two people in a race to discover the structure of the building blocks of what makes us what we are. Also in the race was “the world’s greatest living chemist,” Linus Pauling of the California Institute of Technology. Maurice Wilkens and Rosalind Franklin were at King’s College working “the old-fashioned, scientific way–with the slow work and steady accretion of data.” Pauling and Watson/Crick were on the wrong track; Pauling’s idea had a glaring flaw, and they were looking for a triple helix.

Watson solved the dilemma only after he saw a xray of DNA taken by Franklin, shared without her knowledge. And he never properly accredited her work as contributing to his discovery. Now, Howard Markel writes, it is time to tell how it really happened.

The Secret of Life is filled with big personalities, flawed and eccentric. Inevitably, these scientists clashed over theory and they clashed personally.

Rosalind Franklin was brilliant, dedicated to her work, committed to scientific facts, and “devastatingly blunt”. She worked in X-ray crystallography of DNA. As a Jewish female scientist she had everything stacked against her. She grated on Maurice Wilkins, “a bag of neuroses” who may have been in love with her and angry that she kept her distance.

Watson was impatient and clumsy; he didn’t do experiments but envisioned things in his head and then built a model. Crick was the mathematician with a “dazzling” grasp of biophysics. The two hit it off right away.

Wilkens and Franklin were doing the bedrock of scientific research.

Also in the race was the eccentric Pauling, who had helped create the Atom bomb and now wanted to contribute something monumentally positive to science.

Watson and Crick’s structure explains everything. Linus Pauling quoted in The Secret of Life

Markel follows the scientific advancement of understanding DNA, first with the history. Then, he follows the rivals in their research and their personal lives, showing all the steps in their understanding along the way. Watson and Crick won the acclaim for discovering the structure of DNA, forgetting to mention the x-ray that gave Watson the insight he needed.

Franklin’s early death from cancer was likely caused from the radiation she was exposed to in her work. Before her death, she became close to Crick and she and Watson forgot their differences.

Watson invited Wilkens to share in the prize, but not Franklin. “You don’t usually win the Nobel Prize for data you can’t interpret,” Watkins said to the author. But he also admitted his actions were not “exactly honorable.”

Markel’s book is at once high drama and an explanation of the science that lead up to Watson’s ah-ha moment. I grasped the idea of the chemistry without understanding chemistry (chemistry was not one of my finer achievements in high school). It was a challenging read for me, but my interest was caught by the wonderful portraits of these personalities.

I received a galley from the publisher through NetGalley. My review is fair and unbiased.

Was this review helpful?

Fabulous - reads like a great who-done-it

I absolutely loved this book. As a history of the discovery of the structure of DNA, it excels and is the best book I’ve read on the subject. I was already familiar with the story as I had studied biology and had read other books on the subject, particularly, “The Dark Lady of DNA” by Brenda Maddox. But Howard Markel’s excellent story-telling makes the story seem completely new. There is a lot of biographical information which I loved, because this story is not just about science; it’s about scientists and their shortcomings as humans. Some of the wording was so clever that I would re-read some of the passages. I did find however, that some knowledge of biology is required to get maximum benefit from the book. If I had to pick nits, they would be that some of the discussion around crystallography was too technical. And I felt that some of the quotes should have been paraphrased by Markel as the original quotes were not always clear. Overall, this is a fabulous book and is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of science. Thank you to Netgalley and W. W. Norton & Company for the advance reader copy.

Was this review helpful?

Very interesting and detailed telling of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Most 2nd level biology students will have heard of James Watson and Francis Crick but fewer will remember Rosalind Franklin without whose painstaking collection of experimental data the structure would never have come to light. This book seeks to rectify that by demonstrating just how important her work was.
Another interesting aspect of the book is the bringing together of a wide plethora of scientists, famous and not so, who all had a valuable contribution to make. About a third of the way in though it seemed to get bogged down in detail starting with Watson’s attempt to get to Cambridge. I’m not sure what this added to the discussion apart from some confusion, on my part at least. At around this point there was also an emphasis placed on Franklin’s physical appearance and dress sense. While I am sure the author had loads of documented evidence that this played a role at the time I’m not sure it was needed in 2021. The misogynist attidutes of her colleagues was all too obvious in their treatment of her work. Watson was also the cause of some disparaging remarks with regard to his physical appearance in his later years and again don’t think it was necessary.
Despite those slight misgivings this is well worth a read for anyone interested in scientific research and the efforts required to get answers to our most searching questions. Thanks to NetGalley and the publishers for this ARC.

Was this review helpful?