Cover Image: Concrete Concept

Concrete Concept

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I really enjoyed this book. It took a very international approach and really showcased the wide variety of ugly beautiful brutalist buildings worldwide.

Was this review helpful?

A charming and irreverent take on a style of architecture most people find inaccessible and ugly, Concrete Concept’s beautiful photography and cheeky text force the reader to reconsider Brutalism and also makes its variations more recognizable. As it is more image-heavy than text-heavy, it is probably best for those seeking a coffee-table book, and certainly one should look elsewhere for in-depth explorations of the Brutalist style and its conceptual basis. I came away from it with a greater affection for a style that I myself have scoffed at quite a bit, and am definitely interested in learning more. Perhaps it’s my own relentless curiosity that makes me wish this book had a little more exposition about Brutalism and its context, but despite this it fulfills a need for a more lighthearted approach to architectural history and is certainly tailor-made for those who are already big fans of the style.

Was this review helpful?

The moment I saw Concrete Concept I knew I had to read it. When it comes to architecture, I’m a classical lover through and through, but Brutalism is my happy exception. Why? No clue. I just know there’s something visceral about slabs of raw concrete stacked up, a statement I’m still trying to figure out. The closest comparison I could make is, it’s a big middle finger thrown out for no reason at all.

**

No modern architectural movement has aroused so much awe and so much ire as Brutalism. This is architecture at its most assertive: compelling, distinctive, sometimes terrifying. But, as Concrete Concept shows, Brutalism can be about love as well as hate.

This inspiring and informative photographic survey profiles 50 brutalist buildings from around the world. Travelling the globe – from Le Corbusier’s Unite d’Habitation (Marseille, France), to the Former Whitney Museum (New York City, USA) to Preston Bus Station (Preston, UK) – this book covers concrete architecture in its most extraordinary forms, demonstrating how Brutalism has changed our landscapes and infected popular culture.

Now in a stylish mini format, this is the perfect tour of Brutalism’s biggest hits.

192 pages
Architecture, photography
Quarto Publishing Group – White Lion
Goodreads

**

Cover: Well. It’s a book about brutalism. Concrete on the cover shouldn’t be a surprise.

Yay!

- Brutalism. You either love it or hate it, right? Not really, no. You can love it and get horrified on occasion – the two things can and will go hand in hand. It’s like the slow-mo train wreck of architecture. Take the St. Mary cathedral in Kyoto, for example: a brutalist church should be a de facto criminal offence with a Ludovico rehab program, featuring Corinthian columns and decorated pediments 24/7. Still, in its concrete horror, it’s a fascinating church. Tons of raw beton brut around the altar? Wow. I love it.

- I also love the writing style. It’s hilarious as Beanland doesn’t mince words and goes all in. You like it? Good. You don’t? Tough.

- You know how I’m always complaining about books featuring too many black/white pictures, right? Well, Concrete Concept is maybe the only photography book that can pull that out. It’s a good choice, as it captures the soul of those buildings. The colored ones are fascinating too.

- I winced and/or went through variations of ‘oh, dear Lord, why’ throughout the entire book. Is this a good thing? Of course. I loved every moment I spent shaking my head at the pictures, because they provoked a reaction. That’s the whole point of… ah, anything under the sun, I guess.

- Great editing. I can’t tell you how happy this makes me, because itsmagic.gif

- Every building is worth mentioning. Compiling the next section took me the biggest chunk of time here, because they all are so good and so awful they deserve some recognition.

Special mention:

- 53 Thomas Street, NY. No windows. A building with no windows.
- Habitat 67, Canada. Why? But in a cute way.
- MASP, Brazil. It reminds me of a spider with red legs.
- CCSS, Costa Rica. This is so confusing, it’s adorable.
- Torres Bianca, Madrid. It’s round. I mean.
- Preston Bus Station, England. The curved edges are a thing of beauty.
- Balfron & Trellick Towers, England. I’m obsessed with the stairs joining the towers with the main buildings. Obsessed.
- Orange County Government Center, USA. I’m not sure what I’m looking at here, but, hey.
- Park Hill, England. The first picture is so powerful. It’s like a reverse mullet, party in the front, business in the back.

Nay!

- Nothing. I wish I could take Concrete Concept out on a date.

TL;DR

5 stars on GR, but it’d deserve more.

Was this review helpful?

Absolutely brilliant! This is a real treat for architecture nerds, but this book is so captivating it's sure to have universal appeal. The collection of these wild, audacious buildings boggles the mind and I'm amazed at the vast scope and endless variety.

The concept of brutalism is explained in an accessible, irreverent way. This is no stuffy textbook, but rather a love letter to anyone who can see beauty in unlikely places. The article for each building is full of interesting commentary on the development, context, and eventual fate of the structures.

The photography is just breathtaking! There are multiple shots of most buildings and highlights of especially unique or clever details. This would be a great gift for anyone interested in art, architecture, history, or traveling.

Many thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for the opportunity to read and review!

Was this review helpful?

If your early experience with Brutalism was like mine--a lower-tier version plopped on state university campuses in the 1970s, you've probably wondered what the hell was going on to veer so sharply from the venerable red brick and ivy. Beanland, with a healthy dose of sarcasm, explains the advent of Big Concrete in the 1950s, as a cooption of the massive Nazi Atlantic Wall bunkers, a confident imposition of modern state power (and a signal of modernism in the developing world), and (in the bizarrely receptive hands of the post-Vatican II Catholic Church) a new relationship of people to the environment in a more egalitarian and equitable way. I still don't LIKE it, but I understand it better.

Was this review helpful?