Medusa is my favourite mythological character and I have been horribly disappointed by other attempts at rewriting her story. This is, so far, the strongest attempt that I have read.

Yet, this is not so much 'Medusa's Story' as it is a snapshot of various characters and events in greek mythology from around the time of Medusa's existence. While everything ultimately ties together, some chapters were rather distracting in how tangential the described events seemed to be, making the book feel unfocused and chaotic. While this accurately reflects the sprawling (and often bizarre) nature of greek mythology, the regular jumping back and forth between narrators and periods of time started to make me lose interest in the story as there was no time to get to know, or care, about any of the characters.

Ultimately, the book is a super easy read so if you are seeking a quick, enjoyable book with a mythological theme, then this will do the trick. For me, however, the book wasn't what I was hoping for. But then I fear that all attempts to tell Medusa's story will fail to fully satisfy me...

(Thank-you to the publishers and Netgalley for having provided me with a proof!)

I have waited months to read this and what an absolute joy this book is. Natalie Haynes is the absolute queen of Greek myth. Her writing is intelligent, well-researched, funny and empathetic. Always telling the story from the female perspective, this book throws away the traditional view of Medusa as the monster and Perseus as the hero. I could not put it down and I will be re-reading again and again. Superb! Thanks to NetGalley and Pan Macmillan publishers for this proof in return for an honest review.

I approached this book with some trepidation and worried that it wouldn’t live up to the hype surrounding its release. However I need not of worried. This is the story of Medusa but also all the characters surrounding her story and how she became cursed – one of the chapters is even told the true point of the snakes! Medusa in this retelling is not a monster as usually portrayed but an unwitting victim of infighting between the gods. I laughed at how unlikeable and weak Perseus became in this retelling and how I loved the petulant infighting of the gods. A thoroughly enjoyable read once I got to grips with all the characters and one which I hope will introduce the world of Greek myths to a whole new audience. Many thanks to NetGalley, the publisher and author for giving me an advance copy in return for an honest review.

Medusa is up there with my favourite Greek influence. Her story is absolutely fascinating and her character is one that is deeply misunderstood and misrepresented in mythological retellings. Therefore, this book was right up my alley and I wanted to see for myself a retelling of her and the facts laid bare.

The beginning was brilliant, and I adored the inclusion of Metis, another favourite of mine, and the insipid nature of the gods, their possessive and testosterone in-fuelled indulgence. I left the book hating every single male that was referenced. Not sure that that was the intent but it’s how I felt all the same. I was kind of glad at what happened to Athena at the end… she truly deserved it!

Unfortunately, this one sort of missed the five star mark for me as I felt like Medusa’s story was yet again overshadowed. We get so many points of views here that I felt like her voice got lost. I wanted more of her and her internal dialogue and inner battles, wanted more of Medusa when she became bejewelled with snakes for her hair.

Thank you to Netgalley and Mantle for the approval of my request to review.

Medusa is one of my favourite Greek myths, especially with how people only remember her as a monster, which this book focuses on dispelling. I really enjoyed the overall progression of this story and the conversations around who decides what a monster is. Some chapters were really unique and captivating, such as the one from the perspective of Medusa's snakes, and the writing is also gorgeous as Natalie Haynes' always is.

However, I feel like the synopsis of this book promises a major focus on Medusa and her story, and though all the POV's eventually come together to show their role in Medusa's story, I did struggle to care about quite a few of them (and there is a fair number) as it went on and found myself just wanting to get back to Medusa. I also found the ending a bit anticlimactic.

Overall a great Medusa retelling and the writing is gorgeous but I feel the synopsis mis-sells it a bit and was expecting more of a focus on Medusa herself.

Told with a fiercely feminist voice - do you think you know Medusa?

Medusa is the sole mortal in a family of gods. Growing up with her Gorgon sisters, she realises that she is the only one who experiences change, or can be hurt. 

When the sea god Poseidon commits an unforgivable act in the temple of Athene, the goddess takes her revenge and Medusa is changed forever. Writhing snakes replace her hair, and her gaze now turns any living creature to stone. The power cannot be controlled: Medusa can look at nothing without destroying it. She is condemned to a life of shadows and darkness.

Until Perseus embarks upon a quest to fetch the head of a Gorgon . . .

‘You’re the one who thinks anything that doesn’t look like you must be a monster.’

You just know sometimes when you read a book it’s going to be huge. I am a big Natalie Haynes fan anyway but this story is fabulous.

‘She screamed until her voice was gone.
It changed nothing.’

Medusa is a real person, not a myth or a monster. She feels, she hurts and her story is flipped on it’s head and told with wit and empathy. The portrayal of her Gorgon sisters and their developing care and love for Medusa was one of the most touching parts of the book for me and as for Perseus - well, not impressed with him! He is definitely not the golden boy we all thought he was.

‘He is a vicious little thug and the sooner you grasp that, and stop thinking of him as a brave boy hero, the closer you’ll be to understanding what actually happened.

It really made me consider the myths as we know them - predominantly told by men, changing with retellings and woven into our psyche and culture. Here Haynes has made this classic myth relevant to us today, told with a fiercely feminist voice, and with passion. This is a story that still resonates down the ages but told for a new generation.

‘And the monster? Who is she? She is what happens when someone cannot be saved.’

This is a gripping story, masterfully woven by the Queen of Greek Mythology, retelling Medusa’s story for today. This is going to be big…HUGE! My forever copy is on it’s way

All the stars

In 'Stone Blind', Natalie Haynes retells the story of Medusa, who through Poseidon's assault and Athene's revenge turned from a kind mortal sister of the Gorgons to a monster capable of turning people to stone. Told from many different perspectives, including Gods, Naiads, Nymphs, and mortals, Haynes describes how Perseus went from trying to protect his mother Danae from a marriage she didn't want, to becoming a cold-blooded killer. As Hayne's writes at the beginning "...the hero isn't the one who's kind or brave or loyal...this particular monster is assaulted, abused and vilified. And yet, as the story is always told, she is the one you should fear...We'll see about that."

Feminist retellings of Greek myths have over the last few years become very popular. Within them there is certainly a huge amount of misogyny and rape to deconstruct. Hayne's is more qualified than most in this area and has written a number of books about Greek myths and has presented a radio 4 programme. While the number of characters can at times feel overwhelming, Hayne's brings all of the events together brilliantly. She presents a medusa who is kind and loving until she is forced to become a monster. Whilst Perseus is certainly no hero, she shows how he is also turned into a monster through a more powerful man's determination to take his mother, and the setting of what, without the Gods interference, would have been an impossible quest. This is a very enjoyable read that I'd certainly recommend.

I am a bit of a newbie when it comes to the fantasy and mythology genre, but, I am widening my perspectives and so dar loving it. The author has done this brilliantly. The story is beautifully written, the characters come alive on the page, the settings pop and all characters have a believable voice. This is a first for me by the author and one I enjoyed and would read more of their work. The book cover is eye-catching and appealing and would spark my interest if in a bookshop. Thank you very much to the author, publisher and Netgalley for this ARC.

From monster to hero. The Medusa myth revisited.

Raped by Poseidon, for which she is punished by Athene, Medusa’s fate is in the hands of Perseus.

Classics scholar Haynes puts the record straight on the Medusa myth. A fascinating story which asks the reader to re-think the idea of the hero, and questions society’s habit of monstering women.

My thanks to NetGalley and Pan MacMillan UK for the ARC.

‘Who decides what is a monster?’ ‘I don’t know,’ said Medusa. ‘Men, I suppose.’ ‘So to mortal men, we are monsters. Because of our teeth, our flight, our strength. They fear us, so they call us monsters.’ ‘But they don’t know who you are.’

‘Can a monster be beautiful if it is still terrifying? Perhaps it depends on how you experience fear and judge beauty.’

The retelling of the story of Medusa but so much more with the background stories of the other gods & goddesses & how Perseus came to set out on his journey.

I loved the sympathy you felt for the Gorgons (usually portrayed as monsters), the snivelling Perseus, reduced to a petulant teenager, the bored & omnipotent gods & goddesses!

One of fondest memories of reading the Greek myths at primary school was the picture I drew of Perseus saving Andromeda who was savagely tied to trees trunks on a boulder at sea! I’m not sure what ten year old me would have made of this version!

If you like the retelling of Greek myths then you’ll love this book.

I have to admit that I have very mixed feelings on this one. I am a Classicist working in Academic Classics publishing, and it is hard for me to take that cap off and just sit through a Greek-myth novel as an un-biased reader. My point being, for a full disclaimer, I can be over critical of the classics-elements…


I was *very* excited for Medusa to finally have her story told, and to an extent she does. Her characterisation is brilliant, and Haynes has created something really special and quite gorgeous with her representation of the gorgons as a true family (ie. The roles of Stheno and Euryale).

I enjoyed the side-narrative about Perseus, and I think Haynes did a brilliant job of contextualising his story and background. His development as a character with Athena and Hermes was hilarious (Haynes’ wit is fantastic, and I love it). His character was a bit confusing at times (he suddenly flips from being quite naive to quite horrid), but Perseus in the original myths is quite a tricky and complicated character to pin down, so I think Haynes has done justice.

Cassiope, Andromeda and Cepheus are stunning characters. Haynes could have written a book all about them and I would have devoured it. Their sections of the narrative were some of my favourite. Also, Dictys in particular was given a brilliant background here, and I really, genuinely appreciated Haynes’ version of him here. Well done.

However. I’m really not a fan of the chopping and changing of perspectives. Haynes has done this increasingly throughout her books, and I think it is a real shame. I didn’t find the novel hard to follow, but I felt this was a bit unnecessary. The novel is interspersed with chapters where an omniscient narrator speaks directly to the readers, which I found a bit patronising (I don’t really want to be told how I feel by a book! And I often wasn’t feeling the way the speaker suggested - it was a bit jarring and kind of lurched you out of the story a bit), but I also noticed no difference between that narrator and the poet/muse in A Thousand Ships. I felt more like Haynes’ own voice was coming through, rather than that of a character. Also, there was a lot of pent-up rage in these portions. I appreciate there is *meant* to be anger in Medusa’s story, and rightly so, but it felt a bit…Aggressive. Detached? I think if Medusa had stayed as ‘Medusa’ in the narrative, and not the ‘Gorgoneion’, this might have kept the narrative together a little more, and I might have felt more for her. I found I had a lot of empathy for Medusa, but not this … alternative version of her.

I also have very mixed feelings on Haynes’ representation of Athena. I have to admit I love Athena as a character (and I’m going off the original representation here - from the ancient works), and I feel Haynes…reduced her. She seems very petulant, childish and immature, offering characteristics which are *not* in line with any representation Athena that I have ever come across. The Greek gods were certainly childish, but in varying degrees, and I feel that Athena has been significantly mis-represented. On the other hand, this does present the story of her growing as a newborn-to-adult goddess, so perhaps Haynes was purposefully trying to show her immaturity as a ‘new’ goddess? I’m not sure.

I also think there was a significant missed opportunity here. One interpretation of the myth of Medusa is that Athena gave her the snake-hair etc. as a *gift*, to protect her against any men/humans in the future, to give her power. This could have been a really, really interesting take, and I’m surprised (and disappointed), that Haynes didn’t take this approach. It might have been nicer to see some solidarity between Athena and Medusa, perhaps.

Despite all of the above, Haynes has written a fab novel that will definitely engage a lot of readers, and introduce more and more people the world of classics. A lot of the writing is absolutely beautiful, hilariously done, and the narrative and interactions of Zeus and Hera, and then Medusa and her sisters, are all captivating and delightful. I would agree that this isn’t fully Medusa’s story, as other reviewers mention, but her story is told, and I do think the back-stories given to Perseus and Andromeda were necessary and fantastic. Overall, a lovely book, a lovely read, and then though a lot of it didn’t sit quite right with me (from a classicist perspective), I’d definitely recommend this to friends and classicists, and I was honoured to receive a copy from Mantle Books (and NetGalley), and I’ll treasure it. So, thank you.

I was quite excited about this book going into it, as I appreciated Medusa's story being retold because she has always been typecast as the villain, and mainly in stories written by men who love to portray her as a spiteful man-hater. However, I do feel that Stone Blind is slightly false advertising, because while Medusa's story is told, it is interwoven with the tales of lots of other Greek figures, to the point where I actually felt that Medusa's story got lost in the mix to be honest, which was disappointing. I did enjoy Haynes' writing style, as I find that I can sometimes be overwhelmed by the Greek myths and in keeping track of all the characters, but this felt informative without being oversimplified, and it reminded me of how much I do really enjoy reading about the Greek Gods and Goddesses.

In this book, the readers is plunged into the world of Greek myths. There is a lot going on - it does a great job of showing the ways in which lots and lots of seperate stories interconnect, overlap and outright disagree with each other. In an age of chronological storytelling and copyright laws will are used to an author telling a story and it standing seperate from other stories. The stories of Greek Mythology were, in the society they were originally for, a living, changeable thing. This book really showcases how complex that is when trying to seperate a story out of this original context.

There are also moments of reflection throught this book on what makes a monster, why we assume certain behaviour makes a hero, why we consider a hero morally good. These moments are frustratingly fleeting.

The book is delivered through many points of view. If you are looking for a large cast, this book will deliver. Each point of view is telling their story. I know mythology quite well, I knew how they were all going to eventually link up. I'm not sure every reader would enjoy the though, particularly because the narrative doesnt feel like it's veering towards one overarching storyline as you read.

Ultimately, this book is not Medusa's story. It doesnt centre her. It doesn't give her voice and experience any more space than she has ever had. Its disappointing as this is really what the book is billed as. Instead, I would say that if you went into this book expecting something more along the lines of a narrative that explains a certain portion of Greek Mythology stories, from the time period in which Medusa was around.

Thank you so much Pan MacMillan and NetGalley fir the arc of Stone Blind by Natalie Haynes in exchange for my honest and unbiased review.

I’ve read a couple of Greek myth retellings this year, and I have enjoyed them, but Natalie Haynes takes a lighter, witty approach to this Medusa retelling that came across brilliantly.

Medusa has been wronged by the gods, deserted by her parents, raped by Poseidon and cursed by Athene. This book retells her story, from her perspective, ensconced within the world if the gods and the numerous politicking and infighting amongst them.

I absolutely adored Medusa’s perspective on Perseus. Definitely told from the wronged female’s perspective.

If you love myths, legends, gods, goddesses, with voracious appetites and little care for mortals, then definitely dive in.

I’m woefully ignorant about Greek myths I think I must have moved schools when these were taught .Some of my education has now been partially completed by reading this novel
The author has an amusing light hearted take on the stories and I very much enjoyed the first 2/3 of the book .For me I started to loose the plot a bit towards the end when more and more characters were introduced and I couldn’t keep
Up with the speed they were arriving .I think I might have enjoyed the novel moor if the author had stuck
To just the Medusa story rather than adding the complex side plots
I suppose one way to describe the book would be Bridgerton for Greek myths all but with slightly less sex or significantly less as Gods appeared to procreate rather carelessly by spilling their seed which was picked up by mortals and lady Gods .
I read an copy on NetGalley Uk the book was published 15th September by Pan MacMillan

I absolutely loved this. medusa has been one of my favourite greek mythological figures for a long time (I even have a tattoo of her), so to be able to read a retelling of her story was so wonderful. Natalie Haynes is so so gifted in weaving together the perspectives of so many characters to build a full picture, without it ever feeling confusing or over complicated. she brilliantly shows the way that women have been misrepresented, how their stories have been pushed to the side to make way for the traditional, male ‘heroes’, and she does so with wry humour and intelligence.

I loved reading this, a Greek myth re-telling not only written from a female perspective, but one that is refreshingly vitriolic in the description of the classic “hero” Perseus. The relationship between the Gorgon sisters was wonderful and reinforced the point that it is men who have historically decided who is a hero and who is a monster. The chapters from different perspectives interwove perfectly to create the epic feel, and while the subject matter was tragic at times Haynes’ wit shone through with her irreverent portrayal of the Olympians.

‘Stone Blind’ is a retelling of the tale of Medusa - the Greek mythology tale of the girl with snakes for hair and the ability to turn you into stone with a single glance. Haynes attempts to spin her tale in a new light, with multiple perspectives from each character involved in her well-told tale.

~

I was really disappointed by this to be honest. I’m a huge fan of Greek mythology re-tellings, having read several in the past year - I eagerly anticipated this. But it just felt clunky, awkward and tricky to keep up with - for a story centred around Medusa, it felt as though she had hardly any page time. It seemed to be everybody else’s story but hers, and even the other tales that were being told were incredibly difficult to keep up with due to the sheer volume of them.

Additionally, the dialogue really let the novel down. In an attempt to make Classics accessible to a Young Adult audience, the Greek gods essentially speak like modern day teenagers - it really took you out of the story and the setting.

Thanks to NetGalley and the team at Macmillan for the ARC.

Full review will be posted soonish and I'll add links to blog as well.

I would like to thank the publisher and netgalley for providing me a copy in exchange for an honest review.

Excellent read, so gripping I couldn't put it down. I love this kind of historical fiction!

Thanks so much to NetGalley and the publishers for letting me access an advance copy in exchange for my honest feedback.