"A brilliant neurodivergent female sleuth colliding with an FBI agent with a secret. A crime that is not all it seems. A page-turning, red-herring-filled murder mystery, perfect for fans of Nita Prose, Richard Osman and Anthony Horowitz.

Ada Latia is twenty-four years old. She used to be the youngest millionaire in the cosmetics industry. She used to be married. Now, she spends her time studying ways to communicate with aliens. After all, aliens could not possibly be more cruel or deceitful than other humans.

Ada's spiteful ex-husband Rex believes autistic people like her are monsters, so she's not surprised when he calls her to share a clickbait article gleefully shouting that one autistic child has killed another at a special school in Idaho.

Rex just means to hurt her, but when Ada reads the article, it's not the lies about autism being fake that catch her eye: it's a disturbing photograph of the dead child. The image of the girl is perfect - too perfect. As if someone has committed a murder, and then carefully staged the scene to cover it up.

Ada reports her suspicions to the FBI, and the case crosses the desk of her old classmate Henry Bloodstone, who invites her to assist him. Ada's not a trained investigator. It's painful for her to come up against situations she's not an expert in. She barely remembers Henry, even though it's clear that he remembers her. But the death is a mystery - and Ada, who counts murder as one of her special interests, has never learned to let a mystery go."

For fans of Patience.

˗ˏˋ 2 stars ⟡ ݁₊ .

im still not sure how i feel about this book. i didn't really like the writing style as most of her sentences were short and choppy and that kinda messed with me. despite this book being 200 pages short, the pace of the mystery was excruciatingly slow to me and made me keep putting down the book. the only reason i finished this book is bc i agreed to ARC read it.

⤷ thank you to netgalley, the publisher and the author for providing me an ARC in exchange for an honest review.

It felt less like a murder mystery and more like a difficult look at the world through an autist’s eyes with some lectures on bullying and misogyny that all women face.

Thank you to NetGalley and Severn House for this DRC.
#ASpecialInterestinMurder #NetGalley

I was interested in this title because the protagonist was someone with autism and I liked the idea of a sort of cozy mystery that played with that dynamic. Ada was maybe a bit rigid in a kind of caricature of an autistic person way but I could see her mellowing over the course of a series. I was not prepared for the graphic nature of the photograph of a dead child that takes up space in the opening pages - it didn't really fit with the set up that was more in line with a cozy mystery. There were a number of things that really took me out of the story - how quickly someone from the FBI gets back to Ada after her tip, the fact that there was this graphic image of a dead child floating around the internet, the low-key romantic vibes between Ada and Henry *four months after the horrific premature death of his wife* and yet "I still found myself drawn into the mystery. The mystery was well plotted and the pacing was good - I'm still not sure that I understand why our protagonist took a timeout of one entire day in the process but otherwise it was well done in terms of pace.

I do think this book suffered a bit from an identity crisis. Did it want to be a cozy mystery, something more Agatha Christie-esque or was it aiming for Tana French with a dark underside? The word autistic was used 237 times which felt a bit heavy handed.

I did enjoy the read though, I am fond of Ada Latia and | probably would read a follow up and hope that the overall affect was stronger. 2.75 stars

When I read that the main character was neurodivergent I was immediately excited to read but the book fell a bit flat for me. The story could have gone in a lot of directions but for me I didn’t enjoy it as much as I wanted to.

The writing style is overly simplistic and lacks depth, making the prose feel choppy and elementary. Characterization, particularly of the protagonist, is also problematic. While neurodivergence is central to the character’s identity, the portrayal often comes across as one-dimensional and reductive, emphasizing diagnostic traits in a way that feels both unrealistic and, at times, alienating—even to neurodivergent readers.

The pacing is slow for a mystery, with little tension to sustain interest. While brevity might appeal to some readers—it’s a quick read—the story’s underdeveloped characters and flat narrative left little impact. Ultimately, this book had potential but didn't resonate with me.

I did not finish this book. I thought it would be something I would enjoy and then I ended up not liking it that much. I think that some people would really enjoy this book. I just personally didn’t and don’t feel the need to continue reading it. I gave it 50% and just wasn’t into it. I constantly was wanting to read other books.

I gave it three stars because I had to give it a rating. I don’t think it deserves two stars or lower. I do think people would like this book. I just personally didn’t.

An autistic woman is sent the photo of a dead child by her mean spirited ex husband, and she becomes convinced that the child was murdered. She reaches out to various forms of authority figures including the FBI, where, by extreme coincidence, a fellow classmate from high school, is now working.

Henry reaches out to Ada and tells her he thinks she may be correct and that he's willing to investigate. The book is told from Ada's point of view which means that we have, not an unreliable narrator necessarily, but one with a different way of processing information and different priorities, which leaves the reader a bit unbalanced. A lot about the story is unrealistic, starting with Henry just showing up, ready to take her to a potential crime scene with no sort of vetting or channels, or whatever. Then in the car on the way to the school where the crime occurred, he wonders if Ada is STILL mad at him for daring to have asked her out on a date back in high school.

Ada is mystified by this whole exchange, as she was completely unaware that he had asked her out, due to a habit of wearing earbuds to drown out loud noises. And being another example of the broken modern man, Henry just assumed her silence in response to his invitation was a withering inability to dignify giving a response to such a ludicrous ask, rather than, you know, checking to see if she even heard him. And he's obsessed over this event since high school, through college, marriage, etc. Sure...

Over and over we are shown that Henry is one of the 'good' ones, for attempting to understand Ada's needs and limitations while repeatedly failing by touching her, or requiring eye contact, or by lying. It all comes off a bit like the traveler who goes to a foreign country armed with 3 phrases in the native language and expects a cookie for his effort.

That being said, Ada for all of her insistence at being truthful and blunt at all costs, lies to herself and Henry as she feels a meltdown coming and at no point ever communicates the need to stop. Again this is a set up for the reader to see how 'good' Henry is, that he doesn't make fun of her, but instead got her to a quiet room. But instead I just felt that she was choosing to make things harder on herself. She is so guarded against Henry or anyone else mocking her but she remains oblivious to how Henry feels even when he flat out tells her.

We're told at the beginning that Ada is 24yrs old which is jarring to remember when we learn that Henry's wife died from cancer, after foregoing treatment in hopes of carrying a child to term. Henry is young to have dealt with that, and also quite young to have any standing at the FBI to carry out such an investigation and bring Ada into it. Needless to say, he didn't.

The whole case centered on 'autist's not being bad or good and the non neurodivergent adults treating the children as good or bad because they were on the spectrum.

Ada was bullied at school and made to feel unwanted in her family and in her marriage, and so goes into the case, convinced that Ella, the child in the photo was made to suffer simply because she was autistic. We learn that Ella wasn't a good fit at the school, but because of the needs for donor money, Ella was allowed to make everyone miserable until finally someone cracked. But instead of letting this be a reminder that differently abled people are like anyone else and as likely to be good or bad as anyone else, we are then shown that as bad as Ella was, the person who killed her was so much worse. Not for killing her but for daring to say that she didn't care for the autisum that made Ella so uncontrollable and how Ella's behavior skewed the results that the school claimed to produce in their students. It was an ugly denouement and Ada loses faith in Henry, not understanding that he was stringing the murderer along in order to get the confession they needed.

Eventually, a disillusioned Ada locks herself away, unaware of the aftermath of the case until finally Henry shows up at her door. He has been reinstated and has the power now to offer her on-going work as a consultant on certain cases where her 'skills' could help. Sort of a new 'magical negro' trope where the only person of color in a movie serves only to take care of the white protagonist. Ada keeps wanting to just be but we are to believe that she can be trotted out like a truth seeking weapon on cases for the FBI with no training or guidance. She's autistic therefore she's RAINMAN.

This book is marketed as the FISRT Ada Latia story, indicating that Henry and Ada will indeed continue to work together.

Though the story fills a gap in autistic literature, I can’t help but think that, just like the fictional students of the NAVITEK school, that real-life autists deserve something with more punch. The overall murder-mystery comes off as contrived, with an FBI agent just happening to know the protagonist from high school. Furthermore, the lack of settings likens the book to a bottle episode of a show with barely any characters. The writing itself lack any figurative language, which, for an autistic narrator might make sense, but it overall creates a repetitive streak with the same words making an appearance several times over, sometimes in the same short paragraph. Overall, it’s an anti-neurotypical manifesto wrapped up in a middle-quality written story. Combine this with a lackluster twist that is more of an info-dump than a nail-biter, the novel sees no growth of the protagonist as she clings to her “I’m always right” ideology in spite of noting many times when she’s either wrong or naive.

So yes the main character is autistic so I immediately grabbed this one.

The author made it so the autistic character gets bullied immediately.

I was sincerely hoping for a book with representation that didn’t have to do with the bullying and societal conflicts disabled people face and would instead be about her being a cool protagonist. I simply could not read this without immediately feeling angry. I wanted a fun cozy mystery.

This is not the book for me.

Thank you for allowing me to sample this book. I am leaving honest feedback voluntarily.

A great quick read, with an interesting story and characters. It shows the importance of not judging anyone by whatever limits you may think they have. Definitely would recommend to crime fans

Not a bad read. Well written but not too exciting. Some places it was very slow paced with repeated descriptions of emotions and similar situations .

When I first saw and read about "A Special Interest In Murder," I was incredibly excited. A cozy mystery with an autistic protagonist written by an autistic author? As a neurospicy cozy mystery reader: Hell to the yes. Unfortunately, the follow-through left quite a bit to be desired.

We meet Ada, fresh off a divorce where she lost the cosmetics company she founded. Her ex, who is incredibly bigoted against autistic people, sends her a blog post about the death of an autistic girl at a boarding school for autistic children. Ada finds some things she thinks are off about the photo, discovers there hasn’t been any other write up about this death, and decides to contact the FBI. Enter a guy she knew in high school: Henry. He’s now an FBI agent, who decides to follow up on Ada’s tip and investigate the murder, with Ada’s help.

This is an incredibly interesting mystery with a lot of twists and turns. And the tight POV certainly gives the setting of a boarding school for autistic kids a different ambiance than we’d have seen from Henry. Ada’s POV is used to great effect when it comes to this.

The first big strain on my suspension of disbelief came when Henry took on this case. There is no reason the FBI would have jurisdiction on the murder of a child at a boarding school—that would fall firmly on the local police. At multiple points, I almost stopped reading this book based entirely on the way everything around the FBI’s taking the case and Ada’s consultation is handled. The only reason I finished it is because I agreed to ARC it. I will say that there is an explanation for some of this in the end. My opinion is that the explanation is not a good one. It still makes very little sense, and it doesn’t change the fact that some of these plot holes are gaping, but for anyone who also wants to throw the book based entirely on this setup, you do get an explanation approximately 90% of the way through.

Next, we have Ada. Just… Ada. I’m the first person who will argue that female characters don’t need to be likable. But Ada is a mess. She comes across as robotic, at best. At worst, she is the literary version of Sheldon Cooper.

There is a lot of telling and not a lot of showing when it comes to the positive traits of Ada’s character. The biggest instance of this is with Ada’s ability to care about anyone else: We’re told repeatedly that she’s empathetic—Henry, at one point, says, “Not many people have your level of empathy”—but we never actually see evidence of this empathy. Instead, we get a person whose response to the sobs of a grieving mother is three paragraphs bemoaning how much sensory overload it’s causing. Who then follows this up by accusing the grieving parents of being one-and-done because they hated the idea that they could have another autistic child. No one in the room (aside from the parents) seems to take any issue with this.

Ada spends pages bitching about Henry asking questions to ensure she’s comfortable and that her needs are met. Complaining about his intuitive judgements. Accusing him of lying, manipulating, and being biased against autistic people, with absolutely no evidence. She wishes he’d tell her she did a good job with something, and then when he does, she gets upset because it isn’t in the specific wording she’d like. Henry, my man, you deserve better than Ada.

The highlight of the book for me was meeting all the various staff at the school, learning the ways their lives had been touched by autistic people, and hearing the different reasons those interactions had given them for choosing to work in the field of autistic education. We see a wide variety, from people who have autistic children in their lives, to those with autistic siblings. The scenes where we got to see them interact with the children at the school were great.

I wish I could say that I know people who would enjoy this book, or that I could think of a target audience that would, but I can’t. The allistic cozy mystery fans I know would be incredibly put off by the massive plot holes in the set up, and the autistic ones would be genuinely upset by the stereotypical representation offered by Ada. More showing and less telling with Ada’s traits would go a long way in turning this book from a Barely Finished to a 3.5-4 Star read, and something I’d be able to recommend.

I'm giving this book a 3/5 star rating because I do not know how to rate my feelings about it. (And since 3/5 is smack in the middle, that feels fair and logical.)

So, this story follows a neuro-divergent detective with an obnoxious ex. And she has to solve a murder alongside the FBI. She used to be a cosmetics industry billionaire (yes, that career change was equally as confusing to me too).

This had so much potential to be fun, but the writing and characterization was not it for me.

I just didn't love the writing style, it was too simplistic in an almost choppy way. Everything was stated so plainly, there was absolutely no character to the writing itself (if that makes sense). I'm not asking every author to have the most flowery writing, that can get annoying too, but having such stagnant sentences really feels so elementary and strange.

My big problem with this book though, the characterization! You will know that this detective main character is neuro-divergent every other sentence. There's nothing wrong with being neuro-divergent, obviously, I am neuro-divergent in like half a dozen different ways. So I get it. But when I am going through life, I'm not looking at people and going "that's not very OCD of them" or "there's no way they're anxious because why are they doing that thing that way." That is not how neuro-divergent people think. But that is how this main character thinks. She thinks people are not autistic because they are not autistic in the exact same way she is...fun fact: every single person is an individual, and therefore, different. Not every single person with the same condition is identical. That is common sense, I fear.

I did some research and the author is autistic, but this reads as if she is not and almost making fun of it? Or talking about it the way people who don't know anything about it do? It was so weird. I'm not trying to invalidate how she moves through the world with her own brain, but she's kind of pushing that way of thinking onto others and it just rubs me the wrong way. It was kind of offensive at times for me.

I also found the mystery and pacing of the story itself to be rather slow. Some people like a slower mystery, I like a much faster paced story. Keep me on the edge of my seat. I just couldn't get into this story (or its characters).

This just wasn't for me. Sorry. It was SUPER short though, I'm sure you could finish it in a single sitting if you wanted to!

Thanks to NetGalley for the e-ARC of this book in exchange for my honest review! My Goodreads review is up and my TikTok (Zoe_Lipman) review will be up at the end of the month with my monthly reading wrap-up.

The book features an autistic amateur detective. Out of the blue our autistic detective's ex sends her a blog about one autistic child killing another - just to hurt her feelings apparently. The death is reportedly accidental but our hero thinks differently. This sets the story in motion.

The author is an adult-diagnosed autistic which lends credibility to the descriptions and viewpoint of our detective. However, in her enthusiasm to introduce us to the world of autism the author presses too hard and piles on every fact and misunderstanding related to autism. It's just too much too soon. It was a fire hose of information. I don't doubt the author, it's just the details of an autistic experience take some time to understand. The agenda is strong in this one.

Having said that, this is a readable story of a mysterious death and a primer on the experience of autism. But there isn't much action or character development and the pacing is slow snd repetitive.

It is also low-key depressing. The protagonist has such a low view of the world. She finds fault everywhere. Is there no joy in her life? Is everyone else broken? Others try to help. Try to understand. Overall, the writing and the characters are inconsistent and sometimes contradictory and confusing. I got a bit tired of the main character stereotyping neurotypical people. Especially after trying so hard not to be stereotyped herself.

And the ex-husband complicates the story unnecessarily. I don't understand his importance. He's not really relevant. There are a lot of different ways the news story that sets the wheels in motion could have gotten to our hero. I don't understand the antagonism of the ex-husband towards our detective. It's vitriolic to an extreme. The author seems to use the character as the enemy of the autistic population at large. But they were married at one time. And she was autistic at the time he married her. Little is explained.

Without the veneer of mystery I'd likely have stopped reading. There are a lot of contractions and things that simply aren't realistic. At every stage I wondered how much of the book was actually describing the author's own experiences. I couldn't shake the feeling that the author was a character between the lines.