How do you identify a psychopath? That’s the question Dr Emilia Dalton, a young psychology academic, and her colleagues are trying to answer! Good book! This book had good suspense, mystery, murder, intriguing, and a few shocking moments! The story was interesting, it wasn’t one of my all time favorite but still worth reading! Thank you NetGalley and the publisher for sharing this book with me!

"Show, don't tell": sadly this book is a great example of what happens when there's no show anywhere. All they do is talk, about the murders, about relationships, about work...
It had a great premise, but it was poorly written.

The premise of this was interesting, as psychopaths do live among us and being an academic the setting and description of that was good. The pacing could be improved in this story as some parts there was a lot packed in and others not a lot happened in a lot of words.

(1.5 stars, rounded down)

I think the story had a lot of potential, but unfortunately the execution was really, really poor.

The Psychopathy Project follows Dr. Emilia Dalton, a psychology academic, who studies the defining characteristics used to identify psychopaths. When two members of the research team are murdered, it becomes clear that everyone involved in the project could be in danger, and everyone on the team becomes a suspect.

I really liked the idea of a murder mystery in an academic setting; I am myself in academia and am always excited to see how these sorts of relationships can be dramatized in fiction. I was also really intrigued by the psychopathy elements.

Unfortunately, I don’t feel like the book delivered on any of the promises it made in the blurb, and I found it to be very poorly written. The book is listed as a thriller, but literally nothing thrilling happened; 95% of the book is Emilia having conversations with her colleagues, and the entire mystery is constructed and solved through gossipy dialogue. The academic setting was important to the plot but it barely added anything to the story besides the general premise (and frankly, the all of the academic jargon in the first third was distracting). The dialogue was extremely unnatural and awkward and there was way too much of it. The thing I was most intrigued by (an exploration of psychopathy) was barely touched upon other than being name dropped over and over again.

I think the idea was great but there are a lot of issues that prevent me from recommending this book.

I didn’t see the twists and turns coming and I really enjoyed the first 30% the most.

I think the pacing felt oddly timed from 30-70% as things got very chaotic but there would be stretches of calm as well. This might be preferred for many readers but for me it felt a bit clonky and it felt like filler combined with the meat of the book.

In other words the twists and turns are intense but the pacing felt weird. It’s hard to explain and might simply be because it’s the ARC on my ereader versus the physical book as I can’t pin point an exact element.

With that being said, this is still a great twisty turner.

There are heavy references to a lab project as well as entries while working on this study so be aware that the formatting is varied throughout the book and there are a lot of details on the study.

While I personally feel this thriller wasn’t for me, I think it’s still a good twisty thriller and it’s got a great cover. 3.5 rounding up to 4.

Thank you for the eARC. I appreciate the opportunity to leave honest feedback voluntarily.

so much exciting and tense moments in this book. way more than i was expecting. a great whodunit with extra spins in between.you are trying to link also the whys to the who and Michele makes you feel almost everything and anything. and when i think ive got to grips with where this might go it delights me again with a new intriguing plot point. was this to do with their research and oh the dark irony if people researching psychopaths are being killed by one.